Information Systems
Not included unless you switch them on: 328,800 postings from Fortune 500 career sites and 68,167 postings from small-employer job boards and 14,055 postings from US federal jobs, collected since 27 September 2026. The published figures stay on the panel they have always used.
How Information Systems relates to the other programs
45,643 of the 118,799 postings outside the United States in the last 90 days count toward Information Systems (38.4%), the largest of the 11 programs. 30,627 count toward it alone; 15,016 also count toward another program. 54.4% are AI-related, against 42.3% across all postings: the 2nd highest of the 11 programs with enough postings to say.
Information Systems is the large circle. Each small circle overlaps it in proportion to how much of its job titles it shares with Information Systems: the most alike program has 80% of its area inside, a program with half that similarity half as much, and one that shares nothing just touches. Around the ring, programs sit next to the ones they share most with. The number in each circle is the exact figure; every circle opens that program.
Most alike on job titles
- Sales13% in common8,876 postings count toward both
account manager · director · customer success manager · manager · sales manager
- Business Management9% in common5,710 postings count toward both
product manager · senior product manager · director · manager · senior manager
- Marketing6% in common3,185 postings count toward both
product manager · senior product manager · director · manager · senior manager
- Strategic Management6% in common2,858 postings count toward both
product manager · senior product manager · director · manager · senior manager
- Global Supply Chain Management4% in common203 postings count toward both
director · manager · senior manager
- Finance3% in common276 postings count toward both
director · manager · senior manager · product manager · product owner
- Accounting3% in common123 postings count toward both
director · manager · senior manager
- Human Resource Management3% in common179 postings count toward both
director · manager · senior manager · recruiter/ account manager
- Experience Design and Management2% in common173 postings count toward both
director · manager · senior manager · principal product designer · product design engineer
- Entrepreneurial Management1% in common32 postings count toward both
Commonest titles, only Information Systems
- senior software engineer 1,161
- software engineer 714
- staff software engineer 438
- engineering manager 372
- data engineer 264
- senior backend engineer 249
- senior data engineer 243
- solutions architect 200
Commonest titles, shared
- product manager 598
- senior product manager 481
- account manager 433
- customer success manager 370
- sales manager 294
- product owner 200
- product lead 184
- sales representative 147
“In common” is the share of the two programs’ job titles mixes that they hold together: for each item, the smaller of its two shares, summed, over the larger, summed. Items shown are the ones both programs ask for most, each held by at least 20 postings in both. Last 90 days, every geography. A posting counts toward a program when the discipline classifier assigns it there (how postings are classified).
Where Information Systems postings fall across the four quadrants
Each bar counts Information Systems postings in one quadrant, not the whole quadrant. The filled part is how many of those are AI-related. The last figure on each row turns it round: how much of that whole quadrant of the labour market Information Systems postings make up. Last 90 days, by real posting date. Each quadrant’s name opens it on the overview, across every program.
- Business, AI-thinthe established business majors, unchanged22,867postings47.2%AI-relatedInformation Systems is 31% of all Business, AI-thin postings
- Business-deep AIan AI-in-business major7,782postings43.5%AI-relatedInformation Systems is 31% of all Business-deep AI postings
- Hybrid AIan information systems major, revised for AI6,225postings75.1%AI-relatedInformation Systems is 77% of all Hybrid AI postings
- Builder-deep AIa computer-science AI degree8,769postings68.0%AI-relatedInformation Systems is 84% of all Builder-deep AI postings
What the four quadrants are cut on. The capabilities a posting asks for, read from its description. A role naming three or more distinct engineering capabilities has builder depth; three or more business capabilities gives business depth. Both is Hybrid, neither is AI-thin. There are four because two yes-or-no tests cross, which is what makes them quadrants rather than a list. The threshold of three is the one the source analysis used, adopted rather than reinvented so the two stay comparable.
The 45,643 postings drawn here are this program’s share of the panel: postings carrying a real posting date from the last 90 days outside the United States that the discipline classifier assigns to it. A posting can count toward more than one program. Quadrants with fewer than 20 postings are left out, and AI shares are withheld below 200.
What each quadrant asks for
Ranked by how far Builder-deep AI sits from the other quadrants, not by how often the item appears. The bar is this region; the ticks are the others. An item everybody asks for tells you nothing about where you are.
Methods and practices
Ways of working, whether codified like Six Sigma or learned by repetition like presenting.
Partly definitional. Quadrants are cut on how many of these terms a posting names, so a quadrant leads on the terms that put it there. The ordering is still informative; the level is not a discovery.
- Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD)about 34 in 100 postings ask for this34%+19.3 points vs the other three
- Observabilityabout 25 in 100 postings ask for this25%+14.4 points vs the other three
- Roadmapabout 11 in 100 postings ask for this11%−11.4 points vs the other three
- DevOpsabout 21 in 100 postings ask for this21%+10.5 points vs the other three
- Debuggingabout 16 in 100 postings ask for this16%+9.8 points vs the other three
- Product managementabout 2 in 100 postings ask for this2.1%−8.0 points vs the other three
- Project managementabout 1 in 100 postings ask for this0.7%−7.8 points vs the other three
- Agileabout 10 in 100 postings ask for this9.5%−7.8 points vs the other three
Shares are of postings in this region over the last 90 days, by real posting date, in the geography chosen above. These figures were fixed to the United States until 22 September 2026 and could not follow that choice; they can now.
Where these numbers come from
115,313 Information Systems postings have been collected in all. The figures above use 45,643 of them: the last 90 days (100,367), and of those, the ones outside the United States. Each bar is one source.
- Remote job boardsboards listing remote roles35,474usedof 73,013 collected52.6%AI-related
- The Musea general job board, not chosen for AI4,370usedof 18,650 collected40.3%AI-related
- Employer career siteschosen because these employers post AI work5,753usedof 13,628 collected75.6%AI-related
- Hacker Newsmonthly hiring threads, mostly without a usable date or place0usedof 9,916 collected
- Unattributedno source recorded46usedof 106 collected
The sources ask for AI at very different rates because they were collected for different reasons, so the 54.4% AI share at the top of the page is a mix of them and moves with that mix. Compare sources side by side rather than reading the pooled figure as the market’s. How each source is collected, and why they are never pooled for the market figures, is under the four sub-corpora on the research page.
What this page cannot tell you yet
No job titles from this program
The rules matching postings to this discipline were written without input from the people who know where these graduates go. Titles you supply become candidate rules, measured against the corpus before anything is published.
No employers from this program
None of the employers who actually hire your graduates have been named, so the panel can only describe firms that happen to post on the boards already collected. Named employers are resolved to their public job feed and collected directly.
Two things from you change all of the above. The job titles your graduates commonly take, and the employers who commonly hire them. Titles become candidate classifier rules; employers become collection targets, deduplicated across every program so the ones several of you name independently get resolved first.
Sign in to add them. Everything you enter is stored as a claim from your program, never merged into the posting evidence, and shown with your program named beside it.